Pain identifies squamous cell carcinoma in organ transplant recipients: the SCOPE-ITSCC PAIN study.

Organ transplant recipients (OTR) are at high risk for cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). We aimed to define clinically meaningful patient-reported warning signals predicting the presence of invasive SCC.Patient-reported signs and symptoms of 812 consecutively biopsied skin lesions from 410 OTR were determined by questionnaire and physical examination and related to the subsequent biopsy-proven diagnoses. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used as a measure of distinction between the predictive values of patient-reported warning signals and the occurrence of SCC. Pain was an independent predictive patient-reported warning signal for a biopsy-proven invasive SCC. The odds ratio from the fully adjusted model predicting SCC was 4.4(95% confidence interval: 2.4­8.2). Higher scores on the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were associated witha greater likelihood for the presence of SCC compared to none or mild pain. The for scores on the VAS from 1to 3, 4 to 6 and 7 to 10 were 4.9 (2.2­10.5), 2.3 (0.96­5.5)and 16.5 (3.6­75.8), respectively. Pain is the most powerful patient-reported warning signal for invasive cutaneous SCC in OTR. Empowerment of patients by education could accelerate diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous SCC.

Photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis in organ transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of actinic keratoses (AK) and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in organ transplant recipients (OTRs) is significantly higher than in immunocompetent patients. Rates of progression and recurrence following treatment are higher too, in part due to the effects of the immunosuppressant drugs. Conventional therapies for AK, using curettage, cryotherapy, surgical excision, topical therapies and photodynamic therapy (PDT), are often less effective, and may be inappropriate, for treating the greater numbers and extent of lesions in OTRs. Moreover, there are no specific protocols for treating this patient population that take into account the need for more frequent treatment and the increased pain associated with treating larger areas. OBJECTIVES: Recently, a pan-European group of dermatologists with expertise in this area met to share current best practice in PDT for the treatment of AK in OTRs. METHODS: The group identified areas where PDT currently is not meeting the needs of these patients and discussed how these gaps might be addressed. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: This position article summarizes those discussions and makes recommendations concerning a standardized protocol for treating OTRs, for a large randomized controlled trial to provide robust data on safety, efficacy and optimal pain control, and to provide pharmaco-economics data that can be used to support extended reimbursement in this patient group. The authors also recommend a second clinical trial to further investigate induced immunosuppression with PDT in healthy volunteers.